What makes hammurabis code so forceful

They trained water to come farther and to new places. This allowed the people to have more crops. Then there was a surplus of crops. I did learn about this, in fourth grade, from the best teacher I have ever had, Mrs. Damp, who never shamed me and was teeny tiny and had a necklace that said her name in hieroglyphics.

I would love to have a beer, and so I do get up and get one and my mind wanders into spots where these questions are shimmying: Would Teddy Roosevelt be a feminist? Would he like me or think I am a wimp? Were the Kennedys just really gross, like, with women? Yes, they were. Why are so many men so gross but still we say that they are heroes? Or maybe I will meet and fall in love with an actually good man, I think, as my stomach lurches with curry-fire and my nipples are randomly hard from the amount of spice in my body.

In the room with the TV, the dog is sniffing for curry, but it is only a memory. I have removed the bowls.

Her mouth has a daytime lipstick on it and she wants me to know this:. Some people must have ended up with more than other people, because of the surplus of crops after they invented irrigation, and so then there was not only a class system but also greed, a new, toothy, fast-breathing, slick-thinking, not-sorry greed.

This woman reminds me of this sequence of events that for some reason I have always been fascinated by ever since Mrs.

Damp told us about it—that there was a surplus and the world changed. Where there should have simply been an equal distribution of goods and general dedication toward community satisfaction and safety, instead greed came in and took a hold of a few key players.

And these key players who were cold enough to look past questions of whether or not what they were doing was humane were Men. Men did it. And they saw the Women having babies out of their bodies. And they saw the babies growing up into what could be a workforce, and they decided to take a crucial and revolting step, which was to make Women and children into property, and to condemn their own spirits and identities to be mostly defined by what happens to their property.

And then, says this British woman, they were. It was made into a system. Somebody did it. He is not a mystery person—his name was Hammurabi and he was a real man and he did it. He said that he did it. He was proud. What this man created is this: the Code of Hammurabi. It was etched onto an obsidian phallus. It is physically scratched into a big hard ancient dick. And to be fair although why must I, after all of this, be fair?! Some are laws that are meant to keep the peace, but they are all spoken in a deeply misogynist voice, and so, in my opinion, they are unjust and they are void.

The Code of Hammurabi is one of the first examples of legalized patriarchy, and it instilled these violent and demented ideals: A woman is the property of a man. A woman does not deserve to have as much as a man and she should not ever have as much as a man ever again.

It says that in order for the men to thrive, women must be kept in line and controlled. It says, This starts now. It says women are worth something great to us, and because of that we must say that they are less than us, and we must never let them know what it is about them that we are trying to take for ourselves.

They must not. It says, Women are property. Men decide what women can do with their bodies. Men own women. We are all separate and must stay divided. Women are beneath, less than, but also, watch out for them, really do watch out!

Suddenly I am exhausted, angry, and near faint. I am thinking of ancient men and ancient stones and granaries and bird-gods.

After I walk the geriatric dog, who is my old friend, and after I wash my dear little face, I get into my bed, which could fit four of me. I lie in the bed and scratch my legs with my feet and feel morose and incredibly young. I get ready to sleep fitfully. I think about the Tigris and Euphrates and what they whisper to each other now when they meet, constantly, at their problematic delta.

It seems to me, as I lie here with my dog, who may very well have been born in Mesopotamia because he is so very old, that once you make it permissible to look away, that is when you irrigate your spiritual landscape with something foul. The Code of Hammurabi is the first evidence of legalized patriarchy. Does that send a shiver through your bones? Does that make you feel like we are currently ruled by fucking mummies who hate our mommies?

Because that is what it is. Does it not seem unnatural that the basis of the interactions between genders in our species is something that was created by a psycho who took too much from an already generous river, thousands of years ago? Nature does not work that way.

Nature does not give a shit about low thinking like that. Nature invited us to be more than apes, more than cave people. Nature pushed us to change. Instinct is real but so are the facts that we lived communally and that human remains have been found buried with tools, both genders buried with tools, buried with babies from the other humans who dwelled next door.

We lived in groups, we acted in a friendly way toward each other. We partied together. That is what we were inclined to do. Because this code thrust Patriarchy into that ancient world, it influenced the creation of every other piece of art in that museum.

The Mesopotamians lived along the banks of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. They were divided into city-states, one of which is the Babylonians. The sixth Amorite king of Babylon was Hammurabi and he ruled the Babylonians under his terrifying law codes. Hammurabi became the first king of the Babylonian Empire following the abdication of his father, Sin-Muballit and he is the best known and most celebrated of all Mesopotamian kings.

Sometimes it's out of our hands. For example, if it was happening in another country. If we started a war with that country it could cause an even bigger war and kill more lives than necessary.

Most people are devastated when they hear about this. All they want to do is help. The Code of Hammurabi was written by King Hammurabi and were the first set of laws to ever be created. Hammurabi created laws, that set standards in his empire and in ancient Mesopotamia. Hammurabi made it clear that the laws were not only to equalize society but also establish fairness and also protect the weak from the strong. However, according to the laws, the punishment for men, women, rich, and the poor, were all different; leading that he made the laws unfair.

The women of Mesopotamia had a series of laws where it clearly shows they were classified as property. Hammurabi is most known for his code. The code of Hammurabi was established to maintain order and justice through Mesopotamia. Order and Justice inevitably constructed and established the city states of Mesopotamia to thrive. This code put the people of the social hierarchy in their place to fulfill their duties.

We must prove Ourselves more powerful than he. Likewise, the story of Gilgamesh is Archetype because it all comes back to the central theme. Firstly Gilgamesh thrives to go on an adventure to fight Humbaba. Their sanctions were humiliating and painful, but quick and cheap.

Julius Caesar was a very important figure to the Roman people because he basically created the Roman Empire by expanding Rome, relieving debt from the roman people, revising the calendar and crafting its imperial system. Julius Caesar created what was known as the Roman Empire by expanding the land Rome had to even more. Before Julius Caesar, the size of the Roman Empire was small but inevitably when Julius Caesar came into the position Rome was expanded quite largely.

The first expansion was the conquest of Gaul or during the Gallic wars because once Caesar became governor of Gaul all that territory was associated with Rome. With this expansion it meant Rome was growing into a very important country. That is why law 48 is just. Law says that if you flood another 's field than you shall pay him the cost of his field and the crops.

This is fair because you destroyed this man 's property now you should have to make up to him what you took away. These are my reasons that the code is. In the landmark Supreme Court case McCleskey v. Kemp, a study conducted by David Baldus, a late Iowa Law Professor, concluded that black defendants indicted for murder were convicted nearly twice as much as white defendants and black defendants who killed white people received the death penalty four times more often than black defendants who killed other black people.

This argument was a highlight of the case, but did not stop the Supreme Court from ignoring the statistics regarding racial bias in capital punishment cases. A vote of ruled that tendencies.

During the 18th century, Hammurabi conquered the four quarters of the world, made great the Kingdom of Babylon.