Why roulette is unbeatable

They split into two roles one as the observer and one as the better. This signal was received by a small electric shock to the chest of the better. After this, the group disbanded with a profit of around Our last story is about two Serbian men and a Hungarian woman who was very tech-savvy. They used a similar system as the Eudaemons. They developed mobile phone laser scanners that were hooked up to computers in order to predict where the ball would land.

This is commonly known as sector targeting. They ended up winning Hope you found the stories interesting, if you want to know more about roulette check out FindFairCasinos! About Us Latest Contact Us. Richard Marcus img source: gettyimages. Wendy Stokes. For example: based on this assumption, we can show that after 24 spins, the probability of more than 1 repeat is extremely close to 1 hence "law of the third" - it does not equal 1, so it is not a true law!

Or 31 blacks in a row must occur now and than! This basically means that if we use a mode of play what I call random play, the law of large numbers will govern our result. So what is random play? Random play examples: 1. Now, lets assume that there is 1,just 1 method that is not random play. Can this beat roulette? All we can say is that it is undecided at best! Sounds strange? There are so many, that I'm not going to count each and every particle.

After studying the behaviour of these so called humans that start at A en travel to B or C for 1 year, I came up with the following statistical law: 1. On any give day he projects numbers on the heads of the humans, and his fellow aliens can bet on what human leaves where, or what human stays on the train. How would you bet? Oh yes, it is a Dutch bet: you will always lose in the long run. Any thoughts? Think about this: the train returns to A again The numbers are based on a zillion observations Bet on the driver to stay on the train!!!

Maybe a strange example, but it illustrates that statistics does describe the process, but does not equal the process in this case to be continued. Hmm that's a good question: I think that most people wil say yes because Yes sometimes you win,but averaged out over all players and time,it's a loser.

And no, when you are a winner for a year: it has nothing to do with special gifts, it's just plain luck can also be calculated how many people emerge as a winner after 1 year using a specific system!

We can put it in a different light altogether and see is the answer is undecided or not: Lets assume that a roulette session is either won or lost. What makes up a session has te be seen yet, but for now lets assume that we know when a roulette sessions starts or ends. We can now write down all spin combinations that might occur in that session. Of course there are a tremendous amount of combinations depending on the session length.

The claim is actually that when we play random, there is always at least 1 combination that will cause us to lose. But can we prove that there is No or more than 1 method that will cause us always to win? My claim is: this is undecided at best. Also, there are systems which can make good money I believe, just need all the right criteria.

It might or might not fail at some point though. Name somebody that has a proven winning system. There isn't one, and you know it.

Well, I use the word "claim" because myself hasn't tried that mentioned method so I can't guarantee anything. But its been proven over and over with math that its loses long term. Thats all you got, El Chipo's Selecta? Even he doesn't play it, he's disappeared with Signum, his newest losing brainchild. Jean-Claud Perseverant Member Noone had ever had a proven winning system.

Mr J Top Member Geez, The Zone, how quickly we forget Anyway why are you so one-sided? Roulette is a complex game. Once casinos thought Blackjack was unbeatable, but a man discovered that by card counting it can be beaten.

The pit bosses in the casinos thought he was cheating and couldn't for hell figure out how he did it besides cheating because it is programmed in their brains that blackjack cannot be beaten so they did not even consider that alternative. Jack Wad Member In roulette, those who know the most, speak the least. U are correct!